Thursday, September 30, 2010

Atlast the awaiting of 61 years comes to an end with the cool judgement as we prayed.

{[(hello friends i gave information which i got from different sites. I'M SORRY IF ANY THING WRONG in the below information. i hope u all will like it.)]}

hello!!!!! friends atlast the suspense which was awaited for 1 day comes to an end with cool result.

The wait of 61 years has come to a fair conclusion with the judges aptly passing on a verdict which makes none a loser. The 2.3 acres land has been equally divided in three parts. One-third part of the disputed land is given to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for 'Ram Lalla'.

  Considering the ancestry, the court has kept the Central dome for the Hindu Mahasabha, as the Hindu idols were placed in 1949 in the land prior to the Babri masjid and again in 1992 after the masjid was demolished. Though they have considered the land to be a Ramjanmasthan, Justices SU Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and DV Sharma maintained that Babar didn't build Babri Masjid demolishing a temple rather on the remains of a temple.
and it was ruled out that there should be taken no action fr 3 months.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

 now let us all know how the case was dealt and what are their results


Summary of the Ayodhya title dispute judgement delivered by Allahabad High Court today.
1. Whether the disputed site is the birth place of Bhagwan Ram?
The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram. Place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as the spirit of divine worshipped as birth place of Lord Rama as a child. Spirit of divine ever remains present every where at all times for any one to invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless also.
2. Whether the disputed building was a mosque? When was it built? By whom?
The disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot have the character of a mosque.
3. Whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple?
The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.
4. Whether the idols were placed in the building on the night of December 22/23rd, 1949?
The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.
5. Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?
O.O.S. No. 4 of 1989, the Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P., Lucknow and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others and O.O.S. No.3 of 1989, Nirmohi Akhara and Another Vs. Sri Jamuna Prasad Singh and others are barred by time.
6. What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and outer courtyard?
It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object of worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right since time immemorial. After the construction of the disputed structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed structure on 22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they were also worshipping. It is also established that the disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Islam.
tenet= A religious doctrine that is proclaimed as true without proof.
religious doctrine=The written body of teachings of a religious group that are generally accepted by that group.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
any how the result is not much biased. 
thanks to u god. thanks for keeping country cool without any violence. 
thanks to every INDIAN who prayed as the situation should be cool.
HINDU MUSLIM BHAAYI BHAAYI. once again its time to prove UNITY IS STRENGTH.
BHAARATH MAATA KI JAIIIIII
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
if any thing wrong in the given information I'M EXTREMELY SORRY..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
comment on my post.
thanks for following me or reading my post.
keep cool.

No comments:

Post a Comment