Thursday, September 30, 2010

Atlast the awaiting of 61 years comes to an end with the cool judgement as we prayed.

{[(hello friends i gave information which i got from different sites. I'M SORRY IF ANY THING WRONG in the below information. i hope u all will like it.)]}

hello!!!!! friends atlast the suspense which was awaited for 1 day comes to an end with cool result.

The wait of 61 years has come to a fair conclusion with the judges aptly passing on a verdict which makes none a loser. The 2.3 acres land has been equally divided in three parts. One-third part of the disputed land is given to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for 'Ram Lalla'.

  Considering the ancestry, the court has kept the Central dome for the Hindu Mahasabha, as the Hindu idols were placed in 1949 in the land prior to the Babri masjid and again in 1992 after the masjid was demolished. Though they have considered the land to be a Ramjanmasthan, Justices SU Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and DV Sharma maintained that Babar didn't build Babri Masjid demolishing a temple rather on the remains of a temple.
and it was ruled out that there should be taken no action fr 3 months.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

 now let us all know how the case was dealt and what are their results


Summary of the Ayodhya title dispute judgement delivered by Allahabad High Court today.
1. Whether the disputed site is the birth place of Bhagwan Ram?
The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram. Place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as the spirit of divine worshipped as birth place of Lord Rama as a child. Spirit of divine ever remains present every where at all times for any one to invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless also.
2. Whether the disputed building was a mosque? When was it built? By whom?
The disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot have the character of a mosque.
3. Whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple?
The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.
4. Whether the idols were placed in the building on the night of December 22/23rd, 1949?
The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.
5. Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?
O.O.S. No. 4 of 1989, the Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P., Lucknow and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others and O.O.S. No.3 of 1989, Nirmohi Akhara and Another Vs. Sri Jamuna Prasad Singh and others are barred by time.
6. What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and outer courtyard?
It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object of worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right since time immemorial. After the construction of the disputed structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed structure on 22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they were also worshipping. It is also established that the disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Islam.
tenet= A religious doctrine that is proclaimed as true without proof.
religious doctrine=The written body of teachings of a religious group that are generally accepted by that group.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
any how the result is not much biased. 
thanks to u god. thanks for keeping country cool without any violence. 
thanks to every INDIAN who prayed as the situation should be cool.
HINDU MUSLIM BHAAYI BHAAYI. once again its time to prove UNITY IS STRENGTH.
BHAARATH MAATA KI JAIIIIII
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
if any thing wrong in the given information I'M EXTREMELY SORRY..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
comment on my post.
thanks for following me or reading my post.
keep cool.

Anxious day ahead

hello friends!!!!
u know what is the importance of this day.
India wakes up to an anxious Thursday.  Morning commuters may not face the usual weekday rush but instead  a posse of constabulary decked out in riot gear patrolling their streets. Children and even working women may stay home. Offices might see thin attendance.
At 3:30 this afternoon, the Allahabad High Court delivers its verdict that whether Muslims or Hindus have rights over the site of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya after 60-plus-years of litigation. The Babri Masjid was destroyed by a mob in 1992, throwing the country into communal violence.
A special Full Bench of Justices S.U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D.V. Sharma of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court will pronounce its verdict on the Ayodhya title suits on Thursday. The final hearing began on July 23, 1996, and verdict was reserved on July 26 this year.
The case timeline
Idols of Rama Lalla were placed surreptitiously in the middle of the floor space under the central dome on December 23, 1949. Soon thereafter, devotees assembled there to worship. On December 29, 1949, the city magistrate exercised control over the whole area.
The first suit was filed on January 16, 1950 by Gopal Simla Visharad in the Faizabad civil court for exclusive rights to perform pooja to Ram Lalla. He sought a restraint order on removal of the idols and a temporary injunction was issued. This order was later confirmed by the civil judge and later by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court.
On December 5, 1950, Paramahansa Ramachandra Das also filed a suit for continuation of the pooja and keeping the idols in the Babri structure. This was pending till August 1990, when out of sheer frustration he withdrew the case.
The third suit was filed in 1959 by the Nirmohi Akhara, seeking a direction to hand over charge of the disputed site from the receiver. The fourth suit was filed in 1961 by the U.P. Sunni Central Wakf Board for a declaration and possession. The fifth suit was filed on July 1, 1989 in the name of Bhagwan Shree Ram Lalla Virajman for a declaration and possession.
On February 1, 1986, a district judge ordered the locks on the mosque removed and the site was opened for Hindu worshippers. Two years earlier, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad had begun a campaign to “liberate” the so-called birthplace of Lord Rama, and the 1986 decision was widely seen at the time as an attempt by the Congress — then in power at the Centre and in U.P. — to upstage the VHP and the Bharatiya Janata Party.
In 1989, the four suits pending in the Faizabad civil court were transferred to the High Court on an application moved by the U.P. Advocate-General.
On October 10, 1991, the U.P. government acquired the 2.77-acre of land around the disputed structure for the convenience of devotees who attend Ram Lalla darshan. On January 7, 1993, the Government of India, with the consent of Parliament, took over some 67 acres of land all around the disputed area and sought the Supreme Court's opinion on whether there existed a Hindu place of worship before the disputed structure was built. But it declined to answer the question. On October 24, 1994, it turned the case back to the Lucknow Bench of the High Court and the suits were heard again from 1996.
Long legal history
In fact, the first suit was filed in 1885, when the Faizabad Deputy Commissioner refused to let Mahant Raghubar Das build a temple on land adjoining the mosque. Das then filed a title suit in a Faizabad court against the Secretary of State for India, seeking permission to build a temple on the Chabutra on the outer courtyard of the Babri Masjid.
His suit was dismissed on grounds that the alleged demolition of an original Ram temple in 1528 had occurred over 350 years earlier, and so it was “too late now” to remedy the grievance. “Maintain status quo. Any innovation may cause more harm than any benefit,” the court said. This suit was revived in 1950.
In August 2002, the High Court ordered a survey by the Archaeological Survey of India to find out whether a temple existed below the mosque or not.
 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

so friends let all of us pray that things should go cool and let us pray that result should be satisfactory to all. let us pray to not happen any violence. HINDU MUSLIM BHAYI BHAYI. BHARATH MAATA KI JAIIIII.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

comment on my post.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

interesting survey on mobile phones in INDIA

Mobile phone sales in the country has touched an all—time high at 38.63 million units in April—June 2010, growing 6.3 per cent quarter—on—quarter, according to advisory firm IDC.

As part of its Quarterly Mobile Handsets Tracker — 2Q 2010, IDC said shipments of mobile handsets in India touched an all—time high of 38.63 million units in a single quarter, driven primarily by low—cost handsets from the domestic brands.

“In the recent quarters, several new players successfully launched their own devices at significantly lower Average Selling Values (ASVs) in the price sensitive India market.

Such handsets found ready acceptance among first time buyers, especially from small towns and villages,” IDC India Associate Vice President—Research Anirban Banerjee said.

While Finnish handset maker Nokia retained its No 1 position, with a market share of 36.3 per cent in terms of units shipped, Korean electronic giant Samsung was on the No 2 slot with a 8.2 per cent share. G’Five with 7.3 percent market share emerged as the No 3 player in the market, said the study.

Also, multi—SIM phones comprised as much as 38.5 per cent of the total shipments to India, as against less than one per cent in the same period last year.

“The India mobile market saw a unique trend of multi—SIM phones capturing 38.5 per cent of the market. 

This could be attributed to several new service providers responding with highly competitive tariff plans to a price sensitive mobile telephony user market,” IDC India Lead Telecoms Analyst Naveen Mishra said.
New brands have led the growth in the handset market, with the ‘emerging vendors’ garnering as much as 33.2 per cent of the total India mobile handset shipments in 2Q 2010, the study said.

This represents a manifold increase from five new vendors, representing 0.9 per cent combined share of units shipped in the January—March 2008 quarter, it added.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
if u like my post then follow me. thnks in advance if u follow my post.


Tuesday, September 28, 2010

interesting surveys

According to the survey, 92.5 percent of adults said they regularly or occasionally research products online before buying them in a store. (BIGresearch)

85.3% of buyers go online to research purchases from the Enquiro B2B survey

Consumers trust friends above experts when it comes to product recommendations (65% trust friends, 27% trust experts, 8% trust celebrities). (Yankelovich)

75% of people don't believe that companies tell the truth in advertisements. (Yankelovich)

91% of moms prefer brands that other moms have recommended (Marketing VOX, October 2006)

Emarketer predicts that by 2012, U.S. B2B social network ad spending is expected to reach $210 million.

Most companies that operate call centers spend 97 percent of their time responding to the individual customer and less than 2 percent exploring the causes of these calls.

Seventy-Three percent of customers base their repurchasing decisions on the quality of service they received when problems occurred.

Customers are willing to pay up to ten percent more for excellent service.

 If Wal-Mart was classified as a country, it would be the 24th most productive country in the world.

When Scott Paper Company first started manufacturing toilet paper they did not put their name on the product because of embarrassment. 

Yahoo! was originally called 'Jerry's Guide to the World Wide Web'. 

The most productive day of the workweek is Tuesday.

There is no tipping at restaurants in Japan.

Name the world’s largest and oldest branded pencil co. It started in 1761. The 8th generation of the family is now running it?
A) faber castell.

On whose life story is the movie SOCIAL NETWORK based ? It’s tag line ‘to make 500 mill. friends you make a few enemies’.
Ans.  Mark Zuckerberg- the founder of Facebook.
.
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
.
..
.
.
.
.
how are these guys?????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
follow me if you like these. tell to your friends also. encourage me then i will post even more things.

Monday, September 27, 2010

today's(sep 27th) importance

Hi!! guys as i promised ill post things which are useful to improve our knowledge.
Today(27 sep) is an important day in GOOGLE's history.
Today is google official b'day.
To discuss about google history, it was incorporated as a company on sep 4th 1998.
Google began in 1996 as a project by Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Larry and Sergey were both studying at Stanford University California. In their research project they came up with a plan to make a search engine that ranked websites according to the number of other websites that linked to that site (and ultimately came up with the Google we have today).
But if you go by when the Google.com domain name was registered, September 15 1997.They celebrated on September 7, the date of the company's incorporation, until 2005. Since 2005 (and also randomly in 2002), they've celebrated on September 27.
So why do they celebrate it on the 27th?
They pushed the date forward in 2005 to allow for the announcement of an index-size milestone (ie the record-breaking number of pages the search engine was sifting through).
.
.
.
.
.
.
if u like this then follow me.

global 500 list

Rank Company Revenues
($ millions)
Profits
($ millions)
1 Wal-Mart Stores 408,214 14,335
2 Royal Dutch Shell 285,129 12,518
3 Exxon Mobil 284,650 19,280
4 BP 246,138 16,578
5 Toyota Motor 204,106 2,256
6 Japan Post Holdings 202,196 4,849
7 Sinopec 187,518 5,756
8 State Grid 184,496 -343
9 AXA 175,257 5,012
10 China National Petroleum 165,496 10,272
11 Chevron 163,527 10,483
12 ING Group 163,204 -1,300
13 General Electric 156,779 11,025
14 Total 155,887 11,741
15 Bank of America Corp. 150,450 6,276
16 Volkswagen 146,205 1,334
17 ConocoPhillips 139,515 4,858
18 BNP Paribas 130,708 8,106
19 Assicurazioni Generali 126,012 1,820
20 Allianz 125,999 5,973
21 AT&T 123,018 12,535
22 Carrefour 121,452 454
23 Ford Motor 118,308 2,717
24 ENI 117,235 6,070
25 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 115,632 11,728
26 Hewlett-Packard 114,552 7,660
27 E.ON 113,849 11,670
28 Berkshire Hathaway 112,493 8,055
29 GDF Suez 111,069 6,223
30 Daimler 109,700 -3,670
31 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone 109,656 5,302
32 Samsung Electronics 108,927 7,562
33 Citigroup 108,785 -1,606
34 McKesson 108,702 1,263
35 Verizon Communications 107,808 3,651
36 Crédit Agricole 106,538 1,564
37 Banco Santander 106,345 12,430
38 General Motors 104,589 --
39 HSBC Holdings 103,736 5,834
40 Siemens 103,605 3,097
41 American International Group 103,189 -10,949
42 Lloyds Banking Group 102,967 4,409
43 Cardinal Health 99,613 1,152
44 Nestlé 99,114 9,604
45 CVS Caremark 98,729 3,696
46 Wells Fargo 98,636 12,275
47 Hitachi 96,593 -1,152
48 International Business Machines 95,758 13,425
49 Dexia Group 95,144 1,404
50 Gazprom 94,472 24,556
51 Honda Motor 92,400 2,891
52 Électricité de France 92,204 5,428
53 Aviva 92,140 1,692
54 Petrobras 91,869 15,504
55 Royal Bank of Scotland 91,767 -4,167
56 PDVSA 91,182 1,608
57 Metro 91,152 532
58 Tesco 90,234 3,690
59 Deutsche Telekom 89,794 491
60 Enel 89,329 7,499
61 UnitedHealth Group 87,138 3,822
62 Société Générale 84,157 942
63 Nissan Motor 80,963 456
64 Pemex 80,722 -7,011
65 Panasonic 79,893 -1,114
66 Procter & Gamble 79,697 13,436
67 LG 78,892 1,206
68 Telefónica 78,853 10,808
69 Sony 77,696 -439
70 Kroger 76,733 70
71 Groupe BPCE 76,464 746
72 Prudential 75,010 1,054
73 Munich Re Group 74,764 3,504
74 Statoil 74,000 2,912
75 Nippon Life Insurance 72,051 2,624
76 AmerisourceBergen 71,789 503
77 China Mobile Communications 71,749 11,656
78 Hyundai Motor 71,678 2,330
79 Costco Wholesale 71,422 1,086
80 Vodafone 70,899 13,782
81 BASF 70,461 1,960
82 BMW 70,444 284
83 Zurich Financial Services 70,272 3,215
84 Valero Energy 70,035 -1,982
85 Fiat 69,639 -1,165
86 Deutsche Post 69,427 895
87 Industrial & Commercial Bank of China 69,295 18,832
88 Archer Daniels Midland 69,207 1,707
89 Toshiba 68,731 -213
90 Legal & General Group 68,290 1,346
91 Boeing 68,281 1,312
92 U.S. Postal Service 68,090 -3,794
93 Lukoil 68,025 7,011
94 Peugeot 67,297 -1,614
95 CNP Assurances 66,556 1,396
96 Barclays 66,533 14,648
97 Home Depot 66,176 2,661
98 Target 65,357 2,488
99 ArcelorMittal 65,110 118
100 WellPoint 65,028 4,746